Search News
For the Media
For media inquiries, call CWA Communications at 202-434-1168 or email comms@cwa-union.org. To read about CWA Members, Leadership or Industries, visit our About page.
Can You Hear Us Now?': Verizon Wireless Loses Lawsuit Over Parody
A federal judge has affirmed that company slogans are fair game for parody in the context of a labor dispute, throwing out Verizon Wireless' lawsuit against CWA for referring to its advertising slogan - "Can You Hear Us Now?" - in the union's own print and broadcast commercials.
CWA's media campaign targeted Verizon Communications for its threatened layoff of thousands of union workers just before the holidays, in violation of the contract. Radio, television and print ads featured union workers raising questions about Verizon's labor policies, pointing out why the proposed layoffs were unfair, and asking, "Verizon: Can You Hear Us Now?"
Verizon Wireless, which is 55 percent owned by Verizon Communications, argued that trademark laws prevented CWA from commenting on Verizon's labor policies by using a parody of the Wireless slogan.
Judge Mary L. Cooper of the New Jersey federal district court disagreed, finding that the trademark laws were intended to prohibit "commercial" activities, not the type of labor speech involved in the CWA campaign.
Verizon Wireless also claimed that CWA's campaign created "confusion" by using its slogan in a dispute with a different company - Verizon Communications. But the court found that any claimed injury to Wireless was "self-inflicted" since it had voluntarily chosen to share the common name, thereby assuming the risk that consumers might think that the two companies were identical.
Because CWA's messages were meant to create public support for Verizon workers, they fell within the classic definition of a labor dispute and were not actionable, Judge Cooper ruled. The court also dismissed defamation and other claims against the union.
In July 2003, arbitrator Shyam Das agreed with CWA that Verizon's layoff of union workers had violated the union contract. The company was ordered to reinstate 2,300 employees with full back pay and the company agreed to reinstate another 1,100 in districts where arbitrations were still pending.
CWA's media campaign targeted Verizon Communications for its threatened layoff of thousands of union workers just before the holidays, in violation of the contract. Radio, television and print ads featured union workers raising questions about Verizon's labor policies, pointing out why the proposed layoffs were unfair, and asking, "Verizon: Can You Hear Us Now?"
Verizon Wireless, which is 55 percent owned by Verizon Communications, argued that trademark laws prevented CWA from commenting on Verizon's labor policies by using a parody of the Wireless slogan.
Judge Mary L. Cooper of the New Jersey federal district court disagreed, finding that the trademark laws were intended to prohibit "commercial" activities, not the type of labor speech involved in the CWA campaign.
Verizon Wireless also claimed that CWA's campaign created "confusion" by using its slogan in a dispute with a different company - Verizon Communications. But the court found that any claimed injury to Wireless was "self-inflicted" since it had voluntarily chosen to share the common name, thereby assuming the risk that consumers might think that the two companies were identical.
Because CWA's messages were meant to create public support for Verizon workers, they fell within the classic definition of a labor dispute and were not actionable, Judge Cooper ruled. The court also dismissed defamation and other claims against the union.
In July 2003, arbitrator Shyam Das agreed with CWA that Verizon's layoff of union workers had violated the union contract. The company was ordered to reinstate 2,300 employees with full back pay and the company agreed to reinstate another 1,100 in districts where arbitrations were still pending.